Texas Federal Court Halts Implementation of Corporate Transparency Act
December 6, 2024
By Shields Legal Group

In a preliminary victory for privately held companies, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, has ruled that Congress lacks the power to essentially override state laws that permit nondisclosure of private company ownership as a feature of entity formation.[1]  In a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 3, 2024, the district court held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which mandates disclosure of Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) to the federal government, is likely unconstitutional.[2]  The district court issued a preliminary injunction halting nationwide enforcement of the CTA and its implementing regulations, determining that private owners have the right to remain anonymous.

The constitutionality of the CTA and its implementing regulations is a matter of first impression in the Fifth Circuit. Stay tuned as this case makes its way to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and eventually, the United States Supreme Court.

You can read Judge Mazzant’s entire Memorandum Opinion and Order here:

In the meantime, private companies should consider the following next steps:

1. Stay informed regarding future developments. The injunction issued by the district court is preliminary and subject to being overturned on appeal or if the federal government ultimately prevails on the merits. Similarly, the incoming Trump administration could direct a reassessment of the CTA’s implementing regulations.

2. Evaluate your company’s current compliance processes related to the CTA and FinCEN reporting requirements. Ensure that your company is prepared to comply in the event the preliminary injunction is lifted.

3. Communicate with your company’s legal advisor for guidance as it pertains to your company’s compliance obligations.


[1] See generally Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 30), Tex. TOP COP Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, No. 4:24-CV-478, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

[2] Id., at p. 2.

Recent Posts

Why Use Signal for Encrypted Text Messaging

What is WhatsApp and Signal? Like the vast majority of people over the age of 16, you’re either reading this on your mobile phone, or have it within arm’s reach. That’s not an accusation, just the reality of modern life, and we all find ourselves in the same boat. If...

Winning Your Case and Your Costs: Legal Fees Recovery in Texas

“State law controls both the award of and the reasonableness of fees awarded where state law supplies the rule of decision.” Tech Pharmacy Servs., LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC, 298 F. Supp. 3d 892, 898 (E.D. Tex. 2017) (citing Mathis v. Exxon Corp., 302 F.3d 448, 461 (5th Cir....

Notice Regarding Corporate Transparency Act

Dear Friends and Clients,  We are reaching out to inform you about a significant change in federal law impacting certain private or small businesses in the United States. The Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) requires certain private companies that meet specific...

The mission of Shields Legal is to bring strategic business insight, professional judgment and competence to your company’s business and legal issues.