Texas Federal Court Halts Implementation of Corporate Transparency Act
December 6, 2024
By Shields Legal Group

In a preliminary victory for privately held companies, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, has ruled that Congress lacks the power to essentially override state laws that permit nondisclosure of private company ownership as a feature of entity formation.[1]  In a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 3, 2024, the district court held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which mandates disclosure of Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) to the federal government, is likely unconstitutional.[2]  The district court issued a preliminary injunction halting nationwide enforcement of the CTA and its implementing regulations, determining that private owners have the right to remain anonymous.

The constitutionality of the CTA and its implementing regulations is a matter of first impression in the Fifth Circuit. Stay tuned as this case makes its way to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and eventually, the United States Supreme Court.

You can read Judge Mazzant’s entire Memorandum Opinion and Order here:

In the meantime, private companies should consider the following next steps:

1. Stay informed regarding future developments. The injunction issued by the district court is preliminary and subject to being overturned on appeal or if the federal government ultimately prevails on the merits. Similarly, the incoming Trump administration could direct a reassessment of the CTA’s implementing regulations.

2. Evaluate your company’s current compliance processes related to the CTA and FinCEN reporting requirements. Ensure that your company is prepared to comply in the event the preliminary injunction is lifted.

3. Communicate with your company’s legal advisor for guidance as it pertains to your company’s compliance obligations.


[1] See generally Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 30), Tex. TOP COP Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, No. 4:24-CV-478, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

[2] Id., at p. 2.

Recent Posts

QSBS Stacking: Opportunity Today, IRS Scrutiny Tomorrow? — Part 1

What is QSBS? Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) under §1202 of the Internal Revenue Code allows eligible founders, employees, and investors to skip paying federal taxes on capital gains when they sell their stock after holding it for five years, provided they meet...

The Hidden Income Tax Problem in Trust Planning — Part 2

The BDIT and BDOT—Promising Structures, Unsettled Authority, and Practical Risk In the first post in this series, we walked through the underlying income tax problem that trusts create and the three ways the tax law allows you to deal with it. That framework is...

The Hidden Income Tax Problem in Trust Planning — Part 1

Understanding grantor trusts, compressed tax brackets, and the overlooked power of Section 678 I recently attended the North Texas Probate Bench Bar and had the pleasure of hearing John Hunter of the Blum Firm speak on the 678 Trust. John and I have crossed paths...

The mission of Shields Legal is to bring strategic business insight, professional judgment and competence to your company’s business and legal issues.